
Tundu Lissu’s Treason Trial Hangs in the Balance as Judges Set to Rule on Critical Evidence
The fate of the case now rests entirely on the judges’ interpretation of complex procedural and evidentiary laws.

The fate of the case now rests entirely on the judges’ interpretation of complex procedural and evidentiary laws.

Building on the previous day’s tactics, Lissu continued to highlight contradictions between ASP Bagyemu’s courtroom testimony and his initial sworn statements.

A central pillar of Lissu’s defence was challenging the claim that he “published” the controversial video that led to his treason charges.

The court session was dominated by Tundu Lissu’s procedural challenges and the prosecution’s first witness, whose testimony he immediately contested as irrelevant.

The Tanzanian court’s decision to dismiss Lissu’s objections means that the case will now proceed to examine the substantive evidence and testimony.

Dar es Salaam – The treason trial of Tanzanian opposition leader Tundu Lissu is set to proceed after the High Court on Monday dismissed his

This sets the stage for a prolonged legal battle over procedural matters before the trial can even begin to address the substantive treason charges.

Lissu insists that the court lacks proper jurisdiction and alleges several procedural irregularities in the handling of the case since his arrest in April.

Lissu, a fierce critic of the government, is accused of treason for allegedly inciting the public to prevent the upcoming elections.

The court halted live broadcasts to protect civilian witnesses after prosecutors cited safety concerns under a High Court order.
The Chanzo Initiative, 2025 © All Rights Reserved